Etherwerx sam rozdaje IPki, tak więc nie ma potrzeby radiusa.
Nie sprawdzałem czy operatory są prawidłowo przyporządkowane, wygląda to tak: ---------------------------------------------- Frame 13 (219 bytes on wire, 219 bytes captured) Arrival Time: Aug 14, 2009 15:47:07.611859000 [Time delta from previous packet: 0.001764000 seconds] [Time since reference or first frame: 0.286292000 seconds] Frame Number: 13 Packet Length: 219 bytes Capture Length: 219 bytes [Frame is marked: False] [Protocols in frame: eth:ip:udp:snmp] Ethernet II, Src: 00:e1:10:1c:65:d6 (00:e1:10:1c:65:d6), Dst: Intel_1b:91:e3 (00:02:b3:1b:91:e3) Destination: Intel_1b:91:e3 (00:02:b3:1b:91:e3) Address: Intel_1b:91:e3 (00:02:b3:1b:91:e3) .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast) .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique address (factory default) Source: 00:e1:10:1c:65:d6 (00:e1:10:1c:65:d6) Address: 00:e1:10:1c:65:d6 (00:e1:10:1c:65:d6) .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = IG bit: Individual address (unicast) .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = LG bit: Globally unique address (factory default) Type: IP (0x0800) Internet Protocol, Src: 195.xx.xx.251 (195.xx.xx.251), Dst: 195.xx.xx.254 (195.xx.xx.254) Version: 4 Header length: 20 bytes Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP 0x00: Default; ECN: 0x00) 0000 00.. = Differentiated Services Codepoint: Default (0x00) .... ..0. = ECN-Capable Transport (ECT): 0 .... ...0 = ECN-CE: 0 Total Length: 205 Identification: 0xefea (61418) Flags: 0x00 0... = Reserved bit: Not set .0.. = Don't fragment: Not set ..0. = More fragments: Not set Fragment offset: 0 Time to live: 64 Protocol: UDP (0x11) Header checksum: 0x54a1 [correct] [Good: True] [Bad : False] Source: 195.xx.xx.251 (195.xx.xx.251) Destination: 195.xx.xx.254 (195.xx.xx.254) User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: snmp (161), Dst Port: 57482 (57482) Source port: snmp (161) Destination port: 57482 (57482) Length: 185 Checksum: 0xdaf9 [correct] Simple Network Management Protocol version: v2c (1) community: configure data: get-response (2) get-response request-id: 1474666885 error-status: resourceUnavailable (13) error-index: 1 variable-bindings: 5 items Item name: 1.3.6.1.4.1.20656.1.2.2.2.1.3.1399 valueType: value (0) value: simple (4294967295) simple: string-value (1) Value: OCTET STRING: ch Item name: 1.3.6.1.4.1.20656.1.2.2.2.1.4.1399 valueType: value (0) value: simple (4294967295) simple: string-value (1) Item name: 1.3.6.1.4.1.20656.1.2.2.2.1.5.1399 valueType: value (0) value: simple (4294967295) simple: string-value (1) Value: OCTET STRING: 195.xx.xx.3 Item name: 1.3.6.1.4.1.20656.1.2.2.2.1.6.1399 valueType: value (0) value: simple (4294967295) simple: string-value (1) Value: OCTET STRING: 00:15:6D:63:8A:FF Item name: 1.3.6.1.4.1.20656.1.2.2.2.1.1.1399 valueType: value (0) value: simple (4294967295) simple: integer-value (0) Value: INTEGER: 4 (0x4)
----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:23:43 +0200, Przemysław Kudyba przemekk@zwierzu.zepsul.net wrote:
Maciej Drobniuch pisze:
W takim razie operatory przypisania eterwerx dostaje poprawne? Rozdajesz po radiusie ma sie rozumiec?
EwX nie umie radiusa ma się rozumieć :)
lms mailing list lms@lists.lms.org.pl http://lists.lms.org.pl/mailman/listinfo/lms
!DSPAM:4a856db9146472079114581!